The Trustee-Beneficiary Conflict of Interest

fine line of trustee beneficiary

When you have a trustee who’s also a beneficiary, there’s an inherent potential conflict of interest. A trustee is a person who’s going to make all of the management decisions for the Trust. For example, the trustee may decide to sell an asset or to keep an asset, but that decision will have an effect on the beneficiaries. The trustee has a duty to treat all of the beneficiaries equally. But, if the trustee is also a beneficiary, they may want one result whereas other beneficiaries may want a different result. The trustee-beneficiary may want to sell the asset whereas the other beneficiaries want to retain that asset. That can be a problem.

Avoiding Conflicts of Interest

So how does a trustee who’s also a beneficiary avoid this conflict of interest so that they’re not later sued for breach of Trust? The answer is that the trustee has to walk a very fine line. They really need to think about their trustee duties first and foremost, because those trustee duties are prescribed by California law. And that means that they can potentially be sued for violating those duties. They’re not going to be sued for violating any duties as the beneficiary, because there are no beneficiary duties.  It’s only the trustee’s duties that they should be concerned about. So they really should put those trustee duties first and foremost in their mind.

Secondly, they should consider having two attorneys. One attorney to advise them on trust matters so that the trustee is getting independent advice from an attorney who’s representing them as trustee and then a separate attorney who’s representing their interest as a beneficiary. By having two different attorneys advise this one person – one as trustee, one as beneficiary – they can later prove that they were getting independent advice about what action to take and they can also, hopefully, prove that their actions did not breach their duties as a trustee.

They should also think about having two separate counsel or two separate sets of counsel. And that can be done by having two different counsels represent their interests as trustees and as a beneficiary. So one attorney to represent them as trustee and one attorney to represent their interests as beneficiary. By having those two separate sets of counsel, that person can later prove that they were getting independent advice about what action to take. They should also consider having separate offices or separate trust accounts so that the trustee does not communicate with the beneficiary’s attorney.

If you would like to learn more about this topic, and if you have any questions, please contact us. You will find lots of info and answers from our experienced attorneys at Albertson & Davidson.

At Albertson & Davidson, our California trust and will litigation attorneys handle a wide range of matters involving trusts, wills, and probate. Our compassionate and skilled legal team has recovered more than $250 million in verdicts and settlements for our deserving probate and estate litigation clients.